top of page
Search

Today's To Do List

-Work out

-Eat

-Make list of tec products

-Web Blog

-Web Page Phone# And Citys

-Grab DvDs

-Up & Under $$$(JoB)

-Kenco $$$(JoB)

-Look at D1 D2 D3 D4open team for Rugby Kalamazoo or leave to play D1

-Cipp

-Buy Eggs & OCBs

- Pick up laptop from donnie

-Eat

-Grab mail from Box

- Make verbal list for errors in Court Case to send for final brief. Trying to wiggle out of trial. (Include the fact defense stated that the reason for failure to state a clam was because…)

- Make verbal list for errors in Court Case to send for final brief. Trying to wiggle out of trial.

(Include the fact defense stated that the reason for failure to state a clam was because…)

1) Tyler Holland identity of all parties, Identity of the breaching party. The defendant did something, or failed to do something. Which by law stated a claim.

2) Under the Dependents motion & sub rule all claims stated by me are to be taken as true in court. This was not applied by the courts. Which fails in disposition do to the fact that the laws are clearly enforceable in this case. Nor are the laws “So clearly unenforceable”. Failing Defendants claim. Failure to State a Claim. Within a judicial forum, the failure to present sufficient facts which, if taken as true, would indicate that any violation of law occurred or that the claimant is entitled to a legal remedy. Failure to state a claim is frequently raised as a defense in civil litigation. Error happens often in the lower court things are missed. 79% of cases are overturned. This case by law and fact is in the same category.

3) It was stated I did not have “evidence”. Cases like these can only award the plaintiff damages if there is evidence. Also in cases such as these every circumstance is open the highly circumstantial evidence. Which I have and had along with other full statements as stated in the summons and complaint. My Evidence was not taken and theirs was. Error affecting my Constitutional Rights. (6th,7th,1st)

4) Proving "actual malice", meaning that the defendant either knew the statement was false or recklessly disregarded whether or not it was true. After an Interview with me giving them knowledge they had recklessly disregarded whether or not it was true. Not caring and continuing. Giving defense no 1 amendment right by LAW.

The Court extended First Amendment protection to false statements of fact in a defamation suit. The Court held such statements, when made about a public official, could not be the basis for awarding damages, at least without evidence that the false statements either were made recklessly or with knowledge of their falsity. The Court suggested that, while false statements contribute nothing of value to political discourse, they need protection to allow "breathing room" for statements that are true.) New York Times v Sullivan (1964)

5) The fact that on paper in brief Defense lied and said that they never said what they said. And I had proof of just that for the 2nd time in my hand provided to the docketing system, court, the judge. And listed in statements, Transcripts and Briefs. Error effecting rights. With respect and honor in any court ends this dispute.

6) Defense Used a single word and not full context and statements and proofs, though law ask for just that. Which I stated all in the summons and complaint. Stories aired & context not leaving the word singular makes statements.

7) Defendant stated this was their opinion. Viewers don’t watch the news for options. They watch for news. Opinions come after the story by the viewers. This is a report not an opinion. “The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” — Malcolm X.

8) The Judge knowing family adding bias

9) Also Ineffective assistance & no counsel. By Law To show deficient performance, the defendant must show that counsel's performance did not equal that of a lawyer with ordinary training and skill in criminal law in the area. I’m not a lawyer I’m a 25 year old Athlete & Entrepreneur.

Remission and trial is a must by law.

– Eat

– Workout

-Eat

9 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page